singularity-forge/docs-internal/building-coding-agents/19-when-to-scrap-and-start-over.md
Lex Christopherson d20d5e8fb5 docs: add Mintlify documentation site and move internal docs
Add a proper public-facing documentation site using Mintlify with 19 MDX
pages covering getting started, auto mode, commands, configuration, and
all user-facing features. Move internal/SDK documentation (Pi SDK, TUI,
context & hooks, research notes, ADRs) to docs-internal/ since they
should not be part of the public documentation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-25 09:54:41 -06:00

27 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

# When to Scrap and Start Over
### The Four Signals (Cross-Model Convergence)
| Signal | What It Looks Like |
|--------|-------------------|
| **Iteration count trending upward** | Task 1: 3 iterations. Task 2: 5. Task 3: 8. Complexity compounding, not resolving. |
| **Test flakiness increasing** | Previously passing tests intermittently fail — hidden coupling being strained |
| **Same files modified repeatedly** | Every task touches the same core module — god object absorbing too much responsibility |
| **Acceptance criteria requiring exceptions** | "Works except when X" / "Passes if you ignore test Y" — agent negotiating with criteria |
### The Reassessment Protocol
When thresholds are crossed, trigger a **focused LLM call** with: manifest + original spec + task summaries + signal data. Prompt: *"Is the current approach viable or would a different architecture serve better? If different, what and why?"*
### The Critical Architectural Enabler: Make Rewrites Cheap
- Clean interface contracts + good test suites → rewriting internals while preserving interfaces is low-risk
- Tests verify new implementation against same criteria
- Interface contracts ensure nothing downstream breaks
- **Every major approach on a branch** that can be discarded without affecting anything else
Gemini's **"Sunk-Cost Heuristic"**: Monitor "Task Re-entry Rate." If the same 3 tests have been attempted >5 times, or if the refactor-to-feature ratio exceeds 4:1, trigger a "Whiteboard Session."
Grok adds **parallel experimentation**: create a "Rewrite Branch" subgraph, run the same vision on a clean slate for one vertical slice, compare metrics. Only merge if superior. Cost is near-zero because it runs in parallel and is discarded on failure.
---