Split flat docs/ into user-docs/ (guides, config, troubleshooting) and dev/ (ADRs, architecture, extension guides, proposals). Updated docs/README.md index to reflect new paths.
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
When to Scrap and Start Over
The Four Signals (Cross-Model Convergence)
| Signal | What It Looks Like |
|---|---|
| Iteration count trending upward | Task 1: 3 iterations. Task 2: 5. Task 3: 8. Complexity compounding, not resolving. |
| Test flakiness increasing | Previously passing tests intermittently fail — hidden coupling being strained |
| Same files modified repeatedly | Every task touches the same core module — god object absorbing too much responsibility |
| Acceptance criteria requiring exceptions | "Works except when X" / "Passes if you ignore test Y" — agent negotiating with criteria |
The Reassessment Protocol
When thresholds are crossed, trigger a focused LLM call with: manifest + original spec + task summaries + signal data. Prompt: "Is the current approach viable or would a different architecture serve better? If different, what and why?"
The Critical Architectural Enabler: Make Rewrites Cheap
- Clean interface contracts + good test suites → rewriting internals while preserving interfaces is low-risk
- Tests verify new implementation against same criteria
- Interface contracts ensure nothing downstream breaks
- Every major approach on a branch that can be discarded without affecting anything else
Gemini's "Sunk-Cost Heuristic": Monitor "Task Re-entry Rate." If the same 3 tests have been attempted >5 times, or if the refactor-to-feature ratio exceeds 4:1, trigger a "Whiteboard Session."
Grok adds parallel experimentation: create a "Rewrite Branch" subgraph, run the same vision on a clean slate for one vertical slice, compare metrics. Only merge if superior. Cost is near-zero because it runs in parallel and is discarded on failure.