fix: replace ambiguous double-question in discussion reflection step (#1226)
The plain-text fallback for depth verification asked 'Did I capture that correctly? Anything I missed?' — two yes/no questions where a short affirmative maps to opposite intents (yes = confirmed vs yes = missed something). Changed to: 'Did I capture that correctly? If not, tell me what I missed.' — one question, then an instruction, following the pattern established in #963. Fixes #1224
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9b72180da
commit
1e76459813
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Before moving to the wrap-up gate, verify you have covered:
|
|||
- options: "Yes, you got it (Recommended)", "Not quite — let me clarify"
|
||||
- **The question ID must contain `depth_verification`** (e.g. `depth_verification_confirm`) — this enables the write-gate downstream.
|
||||
|
||||
**If `{{structuredQuestionsAvailable}}` is `false`:** ask in plain text: "Did I capture that correctly? Anything I missed?" Wait for confirmation before proceeding.
|
||||
**If `{{structuredQuestionsAvailable}}` is `false`:** ask in plain text: "Did I capture that correctly? If not, tell me what I missed." Wait for confirmation before proceeding.
|
||||
|
||||
If they clarify, absorb the correction and re-verify.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue