From 1e764598132763be85adb91a47785e86131bd79d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Boucher Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:26:06 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix: replace ambiguous double-question in discussion reflection step (#1226) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The plain-text fallback for depth verification asked 'Did I capture that correctly? Anything I missed?' — two yes/no questions where a short affirmative maps to opposite intents (yes = confirmed vs yes = missed something). Changed to: 'Did I capture that correctly? If not, tell me what I missed.' — one question, then an instruction, following the pattern established in #963. Fixes #1224 --- .../extensions/gsd/prompts/guided-discuss-milestone.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/resources/extensions/gsd/prompts/guided-discuss-milestone.md b/src/resources/extensions/gsd/prompts/guided-discuss-milestone.md index 180574018..2c272c98f 100644 --- a/src/resources/extensions/gsd/prompts/guided-discuss-milestone.md +++ b/src/resources/extensions/gsd/prompts/guided-discuss-milestone.md @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Before moving to the wrap-up gate, verify you have covered: - options: "Yes, you got it (Recommended)", "Not quite — let me clarify" - **The question ID must contain `depth_verification`** (e.g. `depth_verification_confirm`) — this enables the write-gate downstream. -**If `{{structuredQuestionsAvailable}}` is `false`:** ask in plain text: "Did I capture that correctly? Anything I missed?" Wait for confirmation before proceeding. +**If `{{structuredQuestionsAvailable}}` is `false`:** ask in plain text: "Did I capture that correctly? If not, tell me what I missed." Wait for confirmation before proceeding. If they clarify, absorb the correction and re-verify.