Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/5116
Simplifies the db migration removing the `DeclaredIncident` model + FK
setup but keeping the other changes (adding `severity` field for
escalation policy, and "Declare incident" step, which is disabled). In
this way deployments for which the original migration was run, this
won't be applied and they will be in sync with the migration status
(eventually a manual step may be needed to remove the table and FK,
which won't be used for now).
# What this PR does
Related to:
- https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2943
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadim Stepanov <vadimkerr@gmail.com>
# What this PR does
Added last alert information
and optimized the API call so it makes 10x less queries by:
* prefetching chatops messages (based on @vadimkerr 's
https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4738)
* using `enrich` from private api
Previously:
<img width="1102" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-24 at 4 47 00 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/84edb78e-257a-49cd-bc94-083dd8d043d7">
Now:
<img width="1066" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-24 at 4 44 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e7dfcc40-dce6-4a0d-9677-910aab2b4f17">
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to [issue link here]
<!--
*Note*: If you want the issue to be auto-closed once the PR is merged,
change "Related to" to "Closes" in the line above.
If you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be sure to
preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [ ] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadim Stepanov <vadimkerr@gmail.com>
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Closes https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2760
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2831
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [ ] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matias Bordese <mbordese@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dominik <dominik.broj@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
**NOTE**: should be merged/released after
https://github.com/grafana/irm/pull/183 has been rolled out to most
stacks (as that frontend update is what will grant that new RBAC
"action" to users whom already have the "OnCall Admin" RBAC role
assigned)
tldr; from the comment in the `RBACPermission.Permission.ADMIN` comment
in `engine/apps/api/permissions.py`:
> NOTE: this is a bit of a hack for now. See
https://github.com/grafana/support-escalations/issues/12625
> Basically when it comes to filtering teams that are configured to
share their resources with
> "Team members and admins", we have no way of knowing, when a user is
ACTUALLY an Admin when RBAC is involed.
>
> Example: Take a user with the basic role of None/Editor/Viewer but
with the "OnCall Admin" role assigned.
> Without this RBAC permission, we have no way of knowing that the user
is ACTUALLY an "Admin".
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Closes https://github.com/grafana/support-escalations/issues/12625
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
Adds validation for rolling users param in the shift api
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Closes [5041](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/5041)
<!--
*Note*: If you want the issue to be auto-closed once the PR is merged,
change "Related to" to "Closes" in the line above.
If you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be sure to
preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
Follow up PR for https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/5004
Tests haven’t caught a bug, so the method and the tests are fixed
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to [issue link here]
<!--
*Note*: If you want the issue to be auto-closed once the PR is merged,
change "Related to" to "Closes" in the line above.
If you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be sure to
preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [ ] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
This PR refactors Throttling for public API and integrations API and
allows to specify organization ratelimits.
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to [issue link here]
<!--
*Note*: If you want the issue to be auto-closed once the PR is merged,
change "Related to" to "Closes" in the line above.
If you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be sure to
preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
Change pagination to return last available page if the page number
exceeds the pages available instead of returning 404. This came up from
if the user is on a page other than the first and they enter a search
and the number of search results are smaller than what would be needed
to reach the current page number it would give a blank page and 404.
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to [issue link here]
<!--
*Note*: If you want the issue to be auto-closed once the PR is merged,
change "Related to" to "Closes" in the line above.
If you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be sure to
preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rares Mardare <rares.mardare@grafana.com>
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2679
Confirmed the query rewriting works via MySQL query logs (index is also
forced for the stats queries):
`2024-07-24T19:50:59.482751Z 3977 Query SELECT `alerts_alertgroup`.`id`
FROM `alerts_alertgroup` FORCE INDEX (`alert_group_list_index`) WHERE
(`alerts_alertgroup`.`channel_id` IN (13) AND (1) AND
(`alerts_alertgroup`.`public_primary_key` LIKE 'test' OR
`alerts_alertgroup`.`inside_organization_number` LIKE 'test' OR
`alerts_alertgroup`.`web_title_cache` LIKE '%test%') AND
`alerts_alertgroup`.`root_alert_group_id` IS NULL AND
((`alerts_alertgroup`.`silenced` = ('0') AND
`alerts_alertgroup`.`acknowledged` = ('0') AND
`alerts_alertgroup`.`resolved` = ('0')) OR
(`alerts_alertgroup`.`acknowledged` = ('1') AND
`alerts_alertgroup`.`resolved` = ('0'))) AND
`alerts_alertgroup`.`started_at` >= '2024-06-24 19:50:58' AND
`alerts_alertgroup`.`started_at` <= '2024-07-24 19:50:58') ORDER BY
`alerts_alertgroup`.`started_at` DESC LIMIT 26
`
Rewriting will only be applied to the alert group search queries, when
the feature flags are enabled. Dependency was already listed as a
requirement.
# What this PR does
Adds two feature flags to experiment with the alert group search feature
(on top of the existing `FEATURE_ALERT_GROUP_SEARCH_ENABLED` flag):
* `FEATURE_ALERT_GROUP_SEARCH_CUTOFF_DAYS` - search window size in days
* `ALERT_GROUPS_DISABLE_PREFER_ORDERING_INDEX` - enable a workaround
that effectively forces the `alert_group_list_index` index to be used
for alert group list requests
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2679
<!--
*Note*: if you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be
sure to preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
We are noticing some
[issues](https://ops.grafana-ops.net/goto/sQFLv4XSg?orgId=1) when
updating routes via Terraform because when receiving multiple concurrent
requests updating position, the order is updated in a transaction but it
is then tried to save again in the `.save` call, which could lead to
`IntegrityError`s, because the order may have been updated in a
concurrent request meanwhile.
Test run with the reproduced error (before the serializer update):
```
_____________________________ test_ordered_model_swap_all_to_zero_via_serializer _____________________________
@pytest.mark.django_db(transaction=True)
def test_ordered_model_swap_all_to_zero_via_serializer():
THREADS = 300
exceptions = []
TestOrderedModel.objects.all().delete() # clear table
instances = [TestOrderedModel.objects.create(test_field="test") for _ in range(THREADS)]
# generate random non-unique orders
random.seed(42)
positions = [random.randint(0, THREADS - 1) for _ in range(THREADS)]
def update_order_to_zero(idx):
try:
instance = instances[idx]
serializer = TestOrderedModelSerializer(
instance, data={"order": 0, "extra_field": idx}, partial=True
)
serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
serializer.save()
instance.swap(positions[idx])
except Exception as e:
exceptions.append(e)
threads = [threading.Thread(target=update_order_to_zero, args=(0,)) for _ in range(THREADS)]
for thread in threads:
thread.start()
for thread in threads:
thread.join()
# can only check that orders are still sequential and that there are no exceptions
# can't check the exact order because it changes depending on the order of execution
> assert not exceptions
E assert not [IntegrityError(1062, "Duplicate entry 'test-0' for key 'base_testorderedmodel.unique_test_field_order'"), IntegrityEr...rder'"), IntegrityError(1062, "Duplicate entry 'test-0' for key 'base_testorderedmodel.unique_test_field_order'"), ...]
THREADS = 300
exceptions = [IntegrityError(1062, "Duplicate entry 'test-0' for key 'base_testorderedmodel.unique_test_field_order'"), IntegrityEr...rder'"), IntegrityError(1062, "Duplicate entry 'test-0' for key 'base_testorderedmodel.unique_test_field_order'"), ...]
instances = [<TestOrderedModel: TestOrderedModel object (841)>, <TestOrderedModel: TestOrderedModel object (842)>, <TestOrderedMod...ject (844)>, <TestOrderedModel: TestOrderedModel object (845)>, <TestOrderedModel: TestOrderedModel object (846)>, ...]
positions = [57, 12, 140, 125, 114, 71, ...]
thread = <Thread(Thread-302 (update_order_to_zero), stopped 139636013323840)>
threads = [<Thread(Thread-3 (update_order_to_zero), stopped 139646722418240)>, <Thread(Thread-4 (update_order_to_zero), stopped ...ate_order_to_zero), stopped 139646608590400)>, <Thread(Thread-8 (update_order_to_zero), stopped 139646600197696)>, ...]
update_order_to_zero = <function test_ordered_model_swap_all_to_zero_via_serializer.<locals>.update_order_to_zero at 0x7f02086274c0>
common/tests/test_ordered_model.py:481: AssertionError
```
# What this PR does
- bumps `uwsgi` to latest version (`2.0.26`), which unblocks us from
bumping Python to 3.12
- bumps Python to 3.12.3
- refactor the Snyk GitHub Actions workflow to use the composable
actions for installed frontend and backend dependencies
- fixes several `AttributeError`s in our tests that went from a warning
to an error in Python 3.12 (see
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/100690)
# Which issue(s) this PR closes
Closes#4358
Closes https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/4387
# What this PR does
Same as https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4422 but returns wait
delays as strings so it's backward-compatible with the mobile app API
calls.
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/2464
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
This PR does a bunch of changes to prepare OnCall for Unified Slack App:
1. Install Slack via Chatops-Proxy. This change contains two parts:
getting a Slack install link from chatops-proxy
([code](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4232/files#diff-437a77d49fc04b92d315651b3df5991000b1ab74cf60aabb21aa77cb2823bf52R46))
and receiving a "slack installed" event from chatops-proxy
([code](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4232/files#diff-976d106f0962be5c1de5e35582193f68435ed0c17f2defd6bd2857bf6e27f65d)).
Also it means that OnCall doesn't need to register slack_links anymore
when slack is connected/disconnected. These changes are behind
UNIFIED_SLACK_APP_ENABLED flag and should be no-op if flag is not
enabled.
2. Get rid of Multiregionatily restrictions - instrument all slack
interactions with a ProxyMeta - json data telling chatops-proxy where to
route the interaction. Note, that it doesn't apply for "Add to
resolution notes" message action - it will be handled differently in
following PR.
3. Move all chatops-proxy related stuff from common/oncall-gateway to
apps/chatops-proxy
Minor changes:
1. Remove usage of **CHATOPS_V3** flag. Chatops v3 is already released
(It's a refactoring from previous quarter)
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadim Stepanov <vadimkerr@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rares Mardare <rares.mardare@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
Allows custom wait durations for:
* `Wait` escalation policy
* `>X alerts per Y minutes` escalation policy
* `Wait` user notification policy
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/2464
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rares Mardare <rares.mardare@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
In cloud we are currently (somewhat) improperly determining whether or
not a Grafana stack had the `accessControlOnCall` feature flag enabled.
At first things worked fine. We would enable this feature toggle via the
Grafana Admin UI, and then the OnCall backend would read this value from
GCOM's `GET /instance/<stack_id>` endpoint (via
`config.feature_toggles`), and everything worked as expected.
There was a recent change made in `grafana/deployment_tools` to set this
feature flag to True for all stacks. However, for some reason, the GCOM
endpoint above doesn't return the `accessControlOnCall` feature toggle
value in `config.feature_toggles` if it is set in this manner (it only
returns the value if it is set via the Grafana Admin UI).
So what we should instead be doing is such instead of asking GCOM for
this feature toggle, infer whether RBAC is enabled on the stack by doing
a `HEAD /api/access-control/users/permissions/search` (this endpoint _is
only_ available on a Grafana stack if `accessControlOnCall` is enabled).
**Few caveats to this ☝️**
1. we first have to make sure that the cloud stack is in an `active`
state (ie. not paused). This is because, no matter if the
`accessControlOnCall` is enabled or not, if the stack is in a `paused`
state it will ALWAYS return `HTTP 200` which can be misleading and lead
to bugs (this feels like a bug on the Grafana API, will follow up with
core grafana team)
2. Once we roll out this change we will effectively **actually** be
enabling RBAC for OnCall for all orgs. The Identity Access team would
prefer a progressive rollout, which is why I decided to introduce the
concept of
[`settings.CLOUD_RBAC_ROLLOUT_PERCENTAGE`](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4279/files#diff-3383aef931e41e44d95829ad971641eeb98fe001be2f5da92217446d300ea1b3R918)
(see also [`Organization.
should_be_considered_for_rbac_permissioning`](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4279/files#diff-2ca9917f4f56349be39545ee8abd459be5076295d02ca3a7ec545152fcddccdfR348-R362))
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/identity-access-team/issues/667
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
Jinja2 filter to parse strings into datetime objects. Previously, only a
limited set of strings could be parsed into datetime objects
([datetime_re](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/_modules/django/utils/dateparse/)).
The addition of this filter allows for strings of any format to be
converted into datetime.
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
<!--
*Note*: if you have more than one GitHub issue that this PR closes, be
sure to preface
each issue link with a [closing
keyword](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
This ensures that the issue(s) are auto-closed once the PR has been
merged.
-->
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
Co-authored-by: Joey Orlando <joey.orlando@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
Display human readable time ranges in AG filters
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Closes https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/4272
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Derynck <michael.derynck@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
- removes unused "custom button" backend code now that we've migrated to
outgoing webhooks
- adds new e2e test for webhooks asserting that an `ngrok`/`express`
webhook handler receives the call as expected + payload is as expected
(related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/2691) - skipped for
now, the test passes locally but fails on GitHub Actions CI, seems to be
networking related
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Derynck <michael.derynck@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
Fix typos in comments
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
Signed-off-by: teslaedison <qingchengqiushuang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joey Orlando <joey.orlando@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
Adds internal API endpoints for
`alert_receive_channels/<id>/webhooks/<webhook_id>`.
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2541
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
**Cleanup label typing:**
1. LabelParam -> two separate types LabekKey and LabelValue
2. LabelData -> renamed to LabelPair.
3. LabelKeyData -> renamed to LabelOption
Data is not giving any info about what this type represents.
4. Remove LabelsData and LabelsKeysData types. They are just list of
types listed above and with new naming it feels obsolete.
5. ValueData removed. LabelPair is used instead.
6. Rework AlertGroupCustomLabel to use LabelKey type for key to make
type system more consistent. Name model type AlertGroupCustomLabel**DB**
and api type AlertGroupCustomLabel**API** to clearly distinguish them.
**Split update_labels_cache into two tasks** update_label_option_cache
and update_label_pairs_cache.
Original task was expecting array of LabelsData (now it's LabelPair) OR
one LabelKeyData ( now it's LabelOption). I believe having one function
with two sp different argument types makes it more complicated for
understanding.
**Make OnCall backend support prescribed labels**. OnCall will sync and
store "prescribed" field for key and values, so Label dropdown able to
disable editing for certain labels.
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
---------
Co-authored-by: Maxim Mordasov <maxim.mordasov@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Yulya Artyukhina <Ferril.darkdiver@gmail.com>
# What this PR does
Disable escaping quotes for html in template results
Alert group 6 shows the new rendering vs group 5 which has the previous
incorrect rendering.
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
#3864
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
Update's `POST /v1/sign` API call to Cloud Auth API
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
---------
Co-authored-by: Victor Cinaglia <victorcinaglia@gmail.com>
# What this PR does
Add necessary headers to ChatopsProxyAPIClient for dev environment
testing.
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
This PR adds support for routing alerts based on labels.
https://www.loom.com/share/4401de6e3c4945d5b8961fe43ee373c9
Additionally:
- improve the typing around the `get_object` method that is inherited by
[`PublicPrimaryKeyMixin.get_object`](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/blob/dev/engine/common/api_helpers/mixins.py#L153)
in most of our models. `PublicPrimaryKeyMixin` is generic, so it can be
more strongly typed when it is being subclassed, which results in better
typing of the `get_object` method in child classes
- I decided to do this because I started looking into this task via the
[`AlertReceiveChannelView.send_demo_alert`
method/endpoint](https://github.com/grafana/oncall/blob/dev/engine/apps/api/views/alert_receive_channel.py#L242).
Within that method, `instance` is not typed because the inherited
`get_object` method is not typed.. I digress 😄
- improve typing around `Alert.create` and
`apps.integrations.tasks.create_alert` functions
- make `Alert.render_group_data` more DRY by extracting some logic out
into `Alert._apply_jinja_template_to_alert_payload_and_labels`
- deduplicate the logic of `value.strip().lower() in ["1", "true",
"ok"]` into a shared function,
`common.jinja_templater.apply_jinja_template.templated_value_is_truthy`
Closes https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/2490
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required) (will be done in #3762)
