chore(sf): auto-prompts residual sweep

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mikael Hugo 2026-05-02 02:45:55 +02:00
parent a4a9c70c65
commit 7942ba4bda
2 changed files with 74 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -1776,6 +1776,9 @@ export async function buildPlanMilestonePrompt(
relMilestoneFile(base, mid, "RESEARCH"),
);
const secretsOutputPath = join(base, relMilestoneFile(base, mid, "SECRETS"));
const inlinedContextWithFraming = framingBlock
? `${framingBlock}\n\n${inlinedContext}`
: inlinedContext;
return loadPrompt("plan-milestone", {
workingDirectory: base,
milestoneId: mid,
@ -1786,7 +1789,7 @@ export async function buildPlanMilestonePrompt(
researchOutputPath,
outputPath: join(base, outputRelPath),
secretsOutputPath,
inlinedContext,
inlinedContext: inlinedContextWithFraming,
sourceFilePaths: buildSourceFilePaths(base, mid),
skillActivation: buildSkillActivationBlock({
base,

View file

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
/**
* Judgment tools expose sf_log_judgment to the agent in autonomous mode.
*
* The agent is instructed (via the system prompt) to call this tool when
* making non-trivial calls so the user can review reasoning at milestone close.
*/
import { Type } from "@sinclair/typebox";
import type { ExtensionAPI } from "@singularity-forge/pi-coding-agent";
import { appendJudgment } from "../judgment-log.js";
export function registerJudgmentTools(pi: ExtensionAPI): void {
pi.registerTool({
name: "sf_log_judgment",
label: "Log Judgment",
description:
"Record an agent judgment call for user review at milestone close. " +
"Call this when choosing between alternatives at an ambiguous decision point. " +
"Does NOT delay or block work — pure append-only side-effect.",
promptSnippet:
"Log a judgment call: decision taken, alternatives considered, reasoning, confidence",
promptGuidelines: [
"Call whenever you choose one approach over plausible alternatives.",
"Set confidence=low when the decision is speculative or you lacked context.",
"Set confidence=high when you had strong evidence for the choice.",
"This call is fire-and-forget — never wait for it or re-read the log mid-task.",
],
parameters: Type.Object({
unitId: Type.String({
description:
"Current unit ID (e.g. M001/S01/T01). Use the active task ID.",
}),
decision: Type.String({
description: "Short description of the decision taken (1-2 sentences).",
}),
alternatives: Type.Array(Type.String(), {
description: "Alternatives that were considered but not chosen.",
}),
reasoning: Type.String({
description:
"Why this decision was made over the alternatives (1-3 sentences).",
}),
confidence: Type.Union(
[Type.Literal("low"), Type.Literal("medium"), Type.Literal("high")],
{
description:
"Agent confidence in the decision: low = speculative, medium = reasonable, high = well-evidenced.",
},
),
}),
execute: async (_toolCallId, params, _signal, _onUpdate, _ctx) => {
appendJudgment(process.cwd(), {
unitId: params.unitId,
decision: params.decision,
alternatives: params.alternatives,
reasoning: params.reasoning,
confidence: params.confidence,
});
return {
content: [
{
type: "text" as const,
text: `Judgment logged for unit ${params.unitId}: "${params.decision}" (confidence: ${params.confidence})`,
},
],
};
},
});
}