test: add regression test for verify-artifact tightened legacy branch
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8f2e120a29
commit
77216f6075
1 changed files with 89 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* Regression test for #3607 — tighten verifyExpectedArtifact legacy branch
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The legacy (pre-migration) fallback in verifyExpectedArtifact previously
|
||||
* accepted either a heading match (### T01 --) or a checked checkbox as proof
|
||||
* that gsd_complete_task ran. A heading alone does not prove completion —
|
||||
* it could result from a rogue write.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The fix removes the hdRe heading regex and requires only a checked checkbox
|
||||
* (cbRe) in the legacy branch, ensuring that only actual tool-completed tasks
|
||||
* are treated as verified.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
import { describe, it } from 'node:test'
|
||||
import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
|
||||
import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs'
|
||||
import { resolve } from 'node:path'
|
||||
|
||||
const src = readFileSync(
|
||||
resolve(process.cwd(), 'src', 'resources', 'extensions', 'gsd', 'auto-recovery.ts'),
|
||||
'utf-8',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
describe('verifyExpectedArtifact legacy branch tightened (#3607)', () => {
|
||||
it('legacy branch does NOT define hdRe heading regex', () => {
|
||||
// Find the legacy fallback section
|
||||
const legacyIdx = src.indexOf('LEGACY: Pre-migration fallback')
|
||||
assert.ok(legacyIdx !== -1, 'LEGACY comment must exist')
|
||||
|
||||
// Check the code within a reasonable window after the LEGACY comment
|
||||
const legacyBlock = src.slice(legacyIdx, legacyIdx + 600)
|
||||
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
!legacyBlock.includes('hdRe'),
|
||||
'hdRe heading regex must NOT exist in legacy branch — heading alone is not proof of completion',
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('legacy branch requires checked checkbox via cbRe', () => {
|
||||
const legacyIdx = src.indexOf('LEGACY: Pre-migration fallback')
|
||||
assert.ok(legacyIdx !== -1)
|
||||
|
||||
const legacyBlock = src.slice(legacyIdx, legacyIdx + 600)
|
||||
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
legacyBlock.includes('cbRe'),
|
||||
'cbRe checked-checkbox regex must exist in legacy branch',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// cbRe must match checked checkboxes [x] or [X]
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
legacyBlock.includes('[xX]'),
|
||||
'cbRe must match both [x] and [X] checkbox variants',
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('legacy branch returns false when no plan file exists', () => {
|
||||
const legacyIdx = src.indexOf('LEGACY: Pre-migration fallback')
|
||||
assert.ok(legacyIdx !== -1)
|
||||
|
||||
const legacyBlock = src.slice(legacyIdx, legacyIdx + 1000)
|
||||
|
||||
// The else branch: no plan file means cannot verify
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
legacyBlock.includes('no plan file'),
|
||||
'missing plan file must be handled with return false',
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('DB available but task not found returns false', () => {
|
||||
const legacyIdx = src.indexOf('LEGACY: Pre-migration fallback')
|
||||
assert.ok(legacyIdx !== -1)
|
||||
|
||||
const legacyBlock = src.slice(legacyIdx, legacyIdx + 1000)
|
||||
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
legacyBlock.includes('DB available but task row not found'),
|
||||
'must handle case where DB is available but task row is missing',
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// The comment should be followed by a return false
|
||||
const commentIdx = legacyBlock.indexOf('DB available but task row not found')
|
||||
const afterComment = legacyBlock.slice(commentIdx, commentIdx + 200)
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
afterComment.includes('return false'),
|
||||
'missing task row when DB available must return false',
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue