docs(M002): reassess roadmap after S01 — no changes needed
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6ae48d2bf
commit
1b87bd046f
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
42
.gsd/milestones/M002/slices/S01/S01-ASSESSMENT.md
Normal file
42
.gsd/milestones/M002/slices/S01/S01-ASSESSMENT.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
|||
# S01 Assessment — Roadmap Reassessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict: Roadmap is fine. No changes needed.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
- Secrets manifest with predicted keys and guidance → S01 ✅ (contract), S04 (runtime)
|
||||
- Auto-mode pauses for uncollected secrets → S03
|
||||
- Guided /gsd flow triggers collection → S03
|
||||
- Existing keys silently skipped → S02, S03
|
||||
- Summary screen before collection → S02
|
||||
- npm run build passes → S04
|
||||
- npm run test passes → S04
|
||||
|
||||
All criteria have at least one remaining owning slice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Retirement
|
||||
|
||||
S01 was tagged `risk:medium` for prompt compliance — whether the LLM reliably produces a parseable manifest. The forgiving parser mitigates malformed output, and the prompt instructions are clear. The risk is partially retired (contract side). Full retirement is S04's job (runtime proof).
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundary Contract Accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
S01's actual output matches the boundary map exactly:
|
||||
- `SecretsManifestEntry` and `SecretsManifest` types in `types.ts`
|
||||
- `parseSecretsManifest()` and `formatSecretsManifest()` in `files.ts`
|
||||
- `secrets-manifest.md` template
|
||||
- `secretsOutputPath` wired through `auto.ts` and `guided-flow.ts`
|
||||
- Planning prompt instructions in both `plan-milestone.md` and `guided-plan-milestone.md`
|
||||
|
||||
No boundary map updates needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
- R001, R002, R003: contract-proven (S01) — on track
|
||||
- R009: validated (S01) — complete
|
||||
- R004, R005, R006, R010: mapped to S02 — unchanged
|
||||
- R007, R008: mapped to S03 — unchanged
|
||||
- All active requirements have owning slices. Coverage is sound.
|
||||
|
||||
## Remaining Slice Ordering
|
||||
|
||||
S02 → S03 → S04 dependency chain is correct. No reordering, merging, or splitting needed.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue