# What this PR does
Fixes escaping for unicode characters in webhooks.
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
#3149
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
This PR add labels for webhooks.
1. Make webhook "labelable" with ability to filter by labels.
2. Add labels to the webhook payload. It contain new field webhook with
it's name, id and labels. Field integration and alert_group has a
corresponding label field as well. See example of a new payload below:
```
{
"event": {
"type": "escalation"
},
"user": null,
"alert_group": {
"id": "IRFN6ZD31N31B",
"integration_id": "CTWM7U4A2QG97",
"route_id": "RUE7U7Z46SKGY",
"alerts_count": 1,
"state": "firing",
"created_at": "2023-11-22T08:54:55.178243Z",
"resolved_at": null,
"acknowledged_at": null,
"title": "Incident",
"permalinks": {
"slack": null,
"telegram": null,
"web": "http://grafana:3000/a/grafana-oncall-app/alert-groups/IRFN6ZD31N31B"
},
"labels": {
"severity": "critical"
}
},
"alert_group_id": "IRFN6ZD31N31B",
"alert_payload": {
"message": "This alert was sent by user for demonstration purposes"
},
"integration": {
"id": "CTWM7U4A2QG97",
"type": "webhook",
"name": "hi - Webhook",
"team": null,
"labels": {
"hello": "world",
"severity": "critical"
}
},
"notified_users": [],
"users_to_be_notified": [],
"webhook": {
"id": "WHAXK4BTC7TAEQ",
"name": "test",
"labels": {
"hello": "kesha"
}
}
}
```
I feel that there is an opportunity to make code cleaner - remove all
label logic from serializers, views and utils to models or dedicated
LabelerService and introduce Labelable interface with something like
label_verbal, update_labels methods. However, I don't want to tie
webhook labels with a refactoring.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dominik <dominik.broj@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
This task does not appear to have been invoked/have any logs associated
within the past month in any of our cloud environments. I'm fairly
certain it is deprecated and can be removed
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
- Enables new webhooks functionality.
- Database migration will automatically convert existing webhooks to new
ones. Note: Converted webhooks are considered "legacy" they will
continue to work as part of your escalation chain but will no longer be
editable. To make changes use the `Make a copy` action and edit that
one, after you can delete your legacy webhook. Remember to connect your
escalation chain with your newly copied webhook!
---------
Co-authored-by: Maxim <maxim.mordasov@grafana.com>
- Rename Firing to Alert Group Created to reduce confusion as to why the
event only first once and not when unresolve or unacknowledge returns
the alert group to the firing state.
- Increase password field length
- Do not filter webhook execution by team, team is just for filtering
ownership now
- Do not log webhook triggers in alert group escalation log if the
webhook does not trigger (Status/response will still be stored)
- Fix formatting for response content and data fields on the Status page
- Add a content length limit for responses being stored (50000
characters)
- Change FIRING trigger for webhooks to be sent after escalation
snapshot has been computed
- Extract users from `notify_to_users_queue` and `notify_schedule` from
escalation snapshot to populate `users_to_be_notified` in webhook
payload
Track all webhook responses data, and allow using this between
alertgroup-related webhooks (e.g. use firing webhook response data when
templating the acknowledge webhook request data).
NOTE: dropping the table is not backwards compatible but the feature is
not enabled (and in any case it would drop log entries only used for
status display)
