# What this PR does
Fix update calls made by terraform when user field is empty or not
present.
Should have been part of: https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/3053
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
https://github.com/grafana/terraform-provider-grafana/issues/1025
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
Fixes a regression that was introduced when actions were remapped to new
webhooks. Validation in the serializer was making the user field no
longer accept blank and None values. This PR makes those values accepted
again.
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
https://github.com/grafana/terraform-provider-grafana/issues/1025
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
- Add public API for Webhooks CRUD, and GET webhook responses
- Add insight resource logs for internal and public webhook API calls
- Change public actions API to wrap Webhooks to maintain compatibility
with existing callers
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
#2792#2793
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
- Adds [`mypy` static type checking](https://mypy-lang.org/) to our CI
pipeline. Currently there is still a **ton** of errors being returned by
the tool, as we'll need to fix pre-existing errors. I think we can
slowly chip away at these errors in small PRs, doing them all in one
large PR is likely very risky.
- Also, this PR starts chipping away at one of the main type errors that
we have which is accessing the `datetime` class (from the `datetime`
library) or `timedelta` function on the `django.utils.timezone` module.
Basically we should be instead accessing these two objects from the
native `datetime` module. This makes sense because the [`__all__`
attribute](https://github.com/django/django/blob/main/django/utils/timezone.py#L14-L30)
in `django.utils.timezone` does not re-export `datetime` or `timedelta`.
- splits `engine` dependencies out into `requirements.txt` and
`requirements-dev.txt`
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated (N/A)
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required) (N/A)
- [ ] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required) (N/A)
# What this PR does
For example, changing the integration's team
```
curl "localhost:8080/api/v1/integrations/CLYV3QBVHDV3T/" \
--request PUT \
--header "Authorization: meow" \
--header "Content-Type: application/json" --data '{"team_id": "TWP6JJJN6LYZX"}'
```
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [ ] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
* Allow non-JSON custom webhook templates, provided they render as valid JSON
Previously, both the provided template _and_ the rendered template had
to be valid JSON in order for validation to pass. This was unnecessarily
restrictive: really, only the rendered template needs to be valid JSON.
It also disallowed using templates such as:
{
"labels": {{ alert_payload.labels | tojson }}
}
even though this would be valid JSON after rendering.
This commit relaxes the validation of custom webhook templates so that
they don't need to be valid JSON, provided that the rendered template
_is_ valid JSON. This is checked using a dummy dictionary of render
params, which use a constant string for the `alert_group_id` field
and a `defaultdict(dict)` for the `alert_payload` field. This should
permit templates like the one above, but still deny templates such as
{
"labels": {{ alert_payload.labels }}
}
which would otherwise fail later if `labels` is not valid JSON.
This should resolve#638.
* Use defaultdict(str) instead of defaultdict(lambda: "")
* Add missing comment to resolution note validation code
* Update validation of resolution notes in public API, too
* Add extra test cases for JSON webhook templates endpoint of public API
