# What this PR does
**NOTE**: should be merged/released after
https://github.com/grafana/irm/pull/183 has been rolled out to most
stacks (as that frontend update is what will grant that new RBAC
"action" to users whom already have the "OnCall Admin" RBAC role
assigned)
tldr; from the comment in the `RBACPermission.Permission.ADMIN` comment
in `engine/apps/api/permissions.py`:
> NOTE: this is a bit of a hack for now. See
https://github.com/grafana/support-escalations/issues/12625
> Basically when it comes to filtering teams that are configured to
share their resources with
> "Team members and admins", we have no way of knowing, when a user is
ACTUALLY an Admin when RBAC is involed.
>
> Example: Take a user with the basic role of None/Editor/Viewer but
with the "OnCall Admin" role assigned.
> Without this RBAC permission, we have no way of knowing that the user
is ACTUALLY an "Admin".
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Closes https://github.com/grafana/support-escalations/issues/12625
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
Same as https://github.com/grafana/oncall/pull/4422 but returns wait
delays as strings so it's backward-compatible with the mobile app API
calls.
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/2464
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
# What this PR does
Allows custom wait durations for:
* `Wait` escalation policy
* `>X alerts per Y minutes` escalation policy
* `Wait` user notification policy
## Which issue(s) this PR closes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall/issues/2464
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] Added the relevant release notes label (see labels prefixed w/
`release:`). These labels dictate how your PR will
show up in the autogenerated release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Rares Mardare <rares.mardare@grafana.com>
# What this PR does
See #2173
Also, closes#2187 . All of the new files under `type_stubs/icalendar`
were autogenerated by running:
```bash
stubgen -p icalendar -o type_stubs
```
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [ ] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
Fixes an issue when multiple user notification policies have duplicated
order values, leading to the following unexpected behaviours:
1. Not possible to rearrange notification policies that have duplicated
orders.
2. The notification system only executes the first policy from each
order group. For example, if there are policies with orders `[0, 0, 0,
0]`, only the first policy will be executed, and all others will be
skipped. So the user will see four policies in the UI, while only one of
them will be actually executed.
This PR fixes the issue by adding a unique index on `(user_id,
important, order)` for `UserNotificationPolicy` model. However, it's not
possible to add that unique index using the ordering library that we use
due to it's implementation details.
I added a new abstract Django model `OrderedModel` that's able to work
with such unique indices + under concurrent load.
Important info on this new `OrderedModel` abstract model:
- Orders are unique on the DB level
- Orders are allowed to be non-consecutive, for example order sequence
`[100, 150, 400]` is valid
- When deleting an instance, orders of other instances don't change.
This is a notable difference from the library we use. I think it's
better to only delete the instance without changing any other orders,
because it reduces the number of dependencies between instances (e.g.
Terraform drift will be much smaller this way if a policy is deleted via
the web UI).
## Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Related to https://github.com/grafana/oncall-private/issues/1680
## Checklist
- [x] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated
- [x] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required)
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required)
# What this PR does
- Adds [`mypy` static type checking](https://mypy-lang.org/) to our CI
pipeline. Currently there is still a **ton** of errors being returned by
the tool, as we'll need to fix pre-existing errors. I think we can
slowly chip away at these errors in small PRs, doing them all in one
large PR is likely very risky.
- Also, this PR starts chipping away at one of the main type errors that
we have which is accessing the `datetime` class (from the `datetime`
library) or `timedelta` function on the `django.utils.timezone` module.
Basically we should be instead accessing these two objects from the
native `datetime` module. This makes sense because the [`__all__`
attribute](https://github.com/django/django/blob/main/django/utils/timezone.py#L14-L30)
in `django.utils.timezone` does not re-export `datetime` or `timedelta`.
- splits `engine` dependencies out into `requirements.txt` and
`requirements-dev.txt`
## Checklist
- [ ] Unit, integration, and e2e (if applicable) tests updated (N/A)
- [ ] Documentation added (or `pr:no public docs` PR label added if not
required) (N/A)
- [ ] `CHANGELOG.md` updated (or `pr:no changelog` PR label added if not
required) (N/A)
